Comments on: The Relationship Between Socialism and Secularism http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/ A First Things Blog Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Hunter Baker http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17614 Hunter Baker Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:55:32 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17614 Keep dancing, Ehrlich. The guy who talks nothing but process never wants to debate. Keep dancing, Ehrlich. The guy who talks nothing but process never wants to debate.

]]> By: C. Ehrlich http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17587 C. Ehrlich Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:05:37 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17587 I think not. Either you have a selective memory or you are simply unaware of how others are deleting things from your threads. If the latter, then censorship is keeping you in the dark. I think not. Either you have a selective memory or you are simply unaware of how others are deleting things from your threads. If the latter, then censorship is keeping you in the dark.

]]> By: Hunter Baker http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17586 Hunter Baker Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17586 You're remembering the wrong person. You’re remembering the wrong person.

]]> By: C. Ehrlich http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17567 C. Ehrlich Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:18:05 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17567 "I have no idea what those concerns would be." Then perhaps you should stop having comments deleted from your threads. “I have no idea what those concerns would be.”

Then perhaps you should stop having comments deleted from your threads.

]]> By: Steve Drake http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17564 Steve Drake Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:19:28 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17564 Ehrlich won't start a substantive discussion because he believes it's beneath him. His bloated ego won't allow it. He's far too superior to have to explain his opinions to anyone. Rather than speak substantively he complains that you're too stupid to understand. His religion, as far as I can tell, is himself. Ehrlich won’t start a substantive discussion because he believes it’s beneath him. His bloated ego won’t allow it. He’s far too superior to have to explain his opinions to anyone. Rather than speak substantively he complains that you’re too stupid to understand. His religion, as far as I can tell, is himself.

]]> By: Hunter Baker http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17544 Hunter Baker Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:47:40 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17544 I have no idea what those concerns would be. I have no idea what those concerns would be.

]]> By: C. Ehrlich http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17541 C. Ehrlich Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:52:51 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17541 Mr. Baker, I've already explained my provisional reservations about starting a substantive discussion with you on a complex issue. I'm sure you read it. The ball is in your court. Mr. Baker, I’ve already explained my provisional reservations about starting a substantive discussion with you on a complex issue. I’m sure you read it. The ball is in your court.

]]> By: Hunter Baker http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17538 Hunter Baker Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:45:37 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17538 This is par for the course for your standard comment, C. Ehrlich. Rather than lodging any substantive objection, you tend to complain about the representation of points of view or any number of side issues. If you disagree with the substance, then just go ahead and express that disagreement with some statements which may be evaluated and responded to themselves. This is par for the course for your standard comment, C. Ehrlich. Rather than lodging any substantive objection, you tend to complain about the representation of points of view or any number of side issues. If you disagree with the substance, then just go ahead and express that disagreement with some statements which may be evaluated and responded to themselves.

]]> By: C. Ehrlich http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2011/03/the-relationship-between-socialism-and-secularism/#comment-17534 C. Ehrlich Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:16:20 +0000 http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=10556#comment-17534 First Things needs to get some other voices in here. Though one expects to have religion informing the politics, here (and at the Acton Institute) it looks as if the politics are steering the religion. First Things needs to get some other voices in here. Though one expects to have religion informing the politics, here (and at the Acton Institute) it looks as if the politics are steering the religion.

]]>