<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomistic penmanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Lythgoe</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15266</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Lythgoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15266</guid>
		<description>I think that, a distinction should be made between the middle age latin, that Aquinas utilized, and his own atrocious handwriting! The latter, was, of course, the only thing atrocious about Aquinas!


Certainly, the middle age latin was different than the latin of early roman times. The better way to state things, is, one must be trained in latin paleography, in order to decipher the latin, of the middle ages, especially the abbreviated forms, often used in middle age latin texts(see THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO AQUINAS, edited by Norman Kretzman, and Eleanor Stump, 1992). The paleography, one must be proficient in, for middle age latin text, and abbreviated text, deciphering, is distinct from the paleo content, of the early roman latin period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that, a distinction should be made between the middle age latin, that Aquinas utilized, and his own atrocious handwriting! The latter, was, of course, the only thing atrocious about Aquinas!</p>
<p>Certainly, the middle age latin was different than the latin of early roman times. The better way to state things, is, one must be trained in latin paleography, in order to decipher the latin, of the middle ages, especially the abbreviated forms, often used in middle age latin texts(see THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO AQUINAS, edited by Norman Kretzman, and Eleanor Stump, 1992). The paleography, one must be proficient in, for middle age latin text, and abbreviated text, deciphering, is distinct from the paleo content, of the early roman latin period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15224</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15224</guid>
		<description>Thomas Aquinas&#039; handwriting actually was given a name by later medievals - it was called the &#039;litterae unintelligibiles&#039; (I trust that no translation is necessary.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Aquinas&#8217; handwriting actually was given a name by later medievals &#8211; it was called the &#8216;litterae unintelligibiles&#8217; (I trust that no translation is necessary.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lina</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15212</link>
		<dc:creator>Lina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15212</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t read it, but it&#039;s very pretty. It would make a great wall paper. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t read it, but it&#8217;s very pretty. It would make a great wall paper. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15206</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to accept the moniker &quot;paleo-Latin&quot; as a description of late medieval Latin, given how near the end of the regular use of the language this period was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to accept the moniker &#8220;paleo-Latin&#8221; as a description of late medieval Latin, given how near the end of the regular use of the language this period was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Lythgoe</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15142</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Lythgoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15142</guid>
		<description>Thank God, for all of those wonderful Dominicians, who transcribed and translated, Aquinas&#039;s Summa Contra Gentiles, and Summa Theologiae (as well as the rest of his some eight million words that he wrote!)

One must admire all of those, well versed in deciphering the paleolinguistics of the period. Their works are truely heroic. The Franciscians, have recently translated the works of William of Occam. Thomas Williams, has done wonderful work, vis a vis Duns Scotus. One must not only know latin, like the back of one&#039;s hand, but the paleo versions of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God, for all of those wonderful Dominicians, who transcribed and translated, Aquinas&#8217;s Summa Contra Gentiles, and Summa Theologiae (as well as the rest of his some eight million words that he wrote!)</p>
<p>One must admire all of those, well versed in deciphering the paleolinguistics of the period. Their works are truely heroic. The Franciscians, have recently translated the works of William of Occam. Thomas Williams, has done wonderful work, vis a vis Duns Scotus. One must not only know latin, like the back of one&#8217;s hand, but the paleo versions of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Payne</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15140</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15140</guid>
		<description>I think I read somewhere that there are fewer than five people in the world who actually can read his handwriting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I read somewhere that there are fewer than five people in the world who actually can read his handwriting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15139</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15139</guid>
		<description>When does the Thomist font come out?  I&#039;d get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When does the Thomist font come out?  I&#8217;d get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Williams</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15137</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15137</guid>
		<description>Is that supposed to be Latin? Seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that supposed to be Latin? Seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/11/thomistic-penmanship/#comment-15136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9473#comment-15136</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;ve read is that he had two secretaries who took dictation from him. He was so voluminous in his output that one wasn&#039;t enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve read is that he had two secretaries who took dictation from him. He was so voluminous in his output that one wasn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
