<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YUBA Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/10/yuba-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/10/yuba-theology/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Ordway</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/10/yuba-theology/#comment-14543</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Ordway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9037#comment-14543</guid>
		<description>Thanks! That mnemonic will stick with me, too, I suspect, and to good effect. I am not a theologian, but much of my writing and ministry work involves making literature, apologetics, doctrine, and so on accessible and meaningful to a broad audience -- that presumably includes many of the YUBA.

Along similar lines, the way that I&#039;ve been keeping myself on the right track for when I teach at my church is to ask &quot;Why does this matter?&quot; 

If I can&#039;t answer that in a way that&#039;s clear and meaningful to my fellow non-academic parishioners, then I need to go back and think about it some more. For instance, this week I&#039;ve been working on a lecture on how to understand and appreciate the language used in the Anglican Rite 1 liturgy (which is very poetic and uses a lot of older stylistic conventions, such as the use of &quot;thee&quot; and &quot;thou&quot;). For me, it&#039;s interesting and satisfying in its own right to think about language, but the real question is, why does this matter? It matters because the Rite 1 language is theologically richer and more profound than the modernized equivalent -- even the thees &amp; thous are theologically significant, in fact! -- and a better understanding will lead to deeper worship and a better theological understanding. 

In fact, I can see that it&#039;s relevant for the young, the unlearned, the busy, and the afflicted... yes, this will be a helpful rubric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! That mnemonic will stick with me, too, I suspect, and to good effect. I am not a theologian, but much of my writing and ministry work involves making literature, apologetics, doctrine, and so on accessible and meaningful to a broad audience &#8212; that presumably includes many of the YUBA.</p>
<p>Along similar lines, the way that I&#8217;ve been keeping myself on the right track for when I teach at my church is to ask &#8220;Why does this matter?&#8221; </p>
<p>If I can&#8217;t answer that in a way that&#8217;s clear and meaningful to my fellow non-academic parishioners, then I need to go back and think about it some more. For instance, this week I&#8217;ve been working on a lecture on how to understand and appreciate the language used in the Anglican Rite 1 liturgy (which is very poetic and uses a lot of older stylistic conventions, such as the use of &#8220;thee&#8221; and &#8220;thou&#8221;). For me, it&#8217;s interesting and satisfying in its own right to think about language, but the real question is, why does this matter? It matters because the Rite 1 language is theologically richer and more profound than the modernized equivalent &#8212; even the thees &amp; thous are theologically significant, in fact! &#8212; and a better understanding will lead to deeper worship and a better theological understanding. </p>
<p>In fact, I can see that it&#8217;s relevant for the young, the unlearned, the busy, and the afflicted&#8230; yes, this will be a helpful rubric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flotsam and jetsam (10/7) &#171; scientia et sapientia</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/10/yuba-theology/#comment-14473</link>
		<dc:creator>Flotsam and jetsam (10/7) &#171; scientia et sapientia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=9037#comment-14473</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanders has an excellent post on the importance of YUBA theology &#8211; that is, theology that is available to and relevant for the Young, Unlearned, Busy, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanders has an excellent post on the importance of YUBA theology &#8211; that is, theology that is available to and relevant for the Young, Unlearned, Busy, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
