In my book The End of Secularism, I have a chapter which is a case study demonstrating that the high-minded adherence to secularism is easily discarded by leftists whenever they find religion convenient to their agenda. Were I to rewrite the book today, I would include the ad being run against Rand Paul by his opponent in the Kentucky senate race.
Here’s the text of the ad:
“Why was Rand Paul a member of a secret society that called the Holy Bible ‘a hoax’ – that was banned for mocking Christianity and Christ?” asks a voice in Conway’s ad. “Why did Rand Paul once tie a woman up? Tell her to bow down before a false idol and say his God was ‘Aqua Buddha?’ “
Now, first off, I have to say that the claim against Rand Paul has to do with a stunt from his college years at Baylor. Having read the original story about Rand’s classmate’s claim, it was clear that he and a friend engaged in a fairly typical fraternity-style prank. I am familiar with the “secret society” he belonged to at Baylor. It is a humorous part of campus-life. A little edgy, but viewed as a real part of the Baylor tradition.
More important, though, the text of the ad shows that liberals are more than ready to use religion as a political issue when it suits their purposes. If the shoe were on the other foot and a conservative were running an ad of this nature, many gray eminences of church-state separation would come forth from the Ivy Leagues, Washington, D.C., and New York City to explain to us how scurrilous and unprincipled it is.
I have yet to hear from Barry Lynn or any of the other great separators of church and state about the Conway ad being run against Rand Paul. And we won’t hear from them. Because this story doesn’t fit their template of conservatives using religion to engage in holy war.

October 20th, 2010 | 10:35 pm | #1
Jonathan Chait from The New Republic did denounce the ad:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/78456/sympathy-rand-paul
October 20th, 2010 | 11:36 pm | #2
The really regrettable thing is that such ads are still so effective. But who is to blame for that?
October 21st, 2010 | 12:27 am | #3
Charles Spurgeon did say that those of a liberal mind were the greatest persecutors.
“The very persons who talk most about being liberal in their views are generally the greatest persecutors. If I must have a religious enemy, let me have a professed and avowed bigot, but not one of your “free thinkers” or “broad churchmen” as they are called, for there is nobody who can hate as they do; and the lovers of liberal-mindedness who have no creed at all think it to be their special duty to be peculiarly contemptuous to those who have some degree of principle, and cannot twist and turn exactly as they can.”
http://www.bluecollarphilosophy.com/2010/08/charles-spurgeon-understood-liberalism.html
October 21st, 2010 | 11:11 am | #4
All I can say is that if I were in Kentucky I would definitely be voting for Rand Paul. Anyone who did that in college is my kind of candidate.
October 21st, 2010 | 11:57 am | #5
Oh dear. The choice is vote for a finger-waving Democrat or a Ayn Rand conservative. KY is turning into Orange County.
October 21st, 2010 | 1:02 pm | #6
I don’t know about you, but I’m writing in Nietzsche.
October 21st, 2010 | 3:38 pm | #7
Adam,
An Ayn Rand conservative!?! You just scared me to death, and I don’t even know what that means. Sounds sinister though.
October 22nd, 2010 | 12:50 pm | #8
As someone who lives in KY, I will vote for neither candidate.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact