SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • De Las Casas: First of all a faulty premise cripples this discussion. It trips over nothing and falls into unreality...
  • Raymond Takashi Swenson: One makes arguments to persuade. Arguments based on a common religious belief are going to...
  • Kevin: Here are the truths from which we can not escape. SSM involves a pledge. It’s a pledge of committed...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: Tom Gilson to Nikolai Volk: “Wrong. Obviously wrong. Blazingly, glaringly, wrong....
  • Bret Lythgoe: I think that it’s fair to say that we have people on both sides of the SSM “debate”,...
  • Nikolai Volk: Okay, this could help clarify things. Suppose we did what I want the state to do, and not regulate...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Monday, August 16, 2010, 7:15 PM

    Back in 2005, Kazuo Ishiguro released his delicate novel “Never Let Me Go.” 

     

     

    You may remember Ishiguro as the author of “Remains of the Day,” which was adapted into a motion picture of the same name starring Anthony Hopkins, Emma Thompson, and Christopher Reeve.  That novel explored the idea that the British Empire had seen the end of its day and that the Second World War would bring this reality to a shattering epiphany. 

    “Never Let Me Go,” cited by Time as the best novel of 2005, is first rate science fiction (and was a finalist for the 2006 Arthur C. Clarke Award), but it is not what one thinks of as traditional science fiction.  There are no spaceships or whirling inventions, but rather the novel is one about cloning and the ethics of that business.  In the novel, clones are raised in order to bank up spare parts for their donors.  They are kept separate from the rest of the world in an academy “Hailsham,” where they are free to create art and happy lives as they prepare to make the donations that will steal their lives one organ at a time.  One may provide a kidney and still live; a heart, however, is unable to be harvested without the expiration of the clone.  In this academy, two clones fall in love and try to bypass the system, hoping to find love that will allow them to transcend their lot in life. 

    Ishiguro asks a provocative question: are clones human?  If not, are they capable of genuine love?  Should they be allowed to have children of their own?  Do they have legal rights?  If they are human, then why should they be required to sacrifice their lives for the sakes of their “donors”?

    The film adaptation of “Never Let Me Go” is coming out on October 1 (trailer here) ; it stars Keira Knightley and Andrew Garfield and will be rated R for nudity and sexuality, according to the trailer, which makes me sad because the delicacy of Ishiguru’s story cries out for subtlety and imagination. 

    If you haven’t read the book and you have any interest in the ethics of cloning, buy the book and put yourself in the shoes of these rich characters, enjoying Ishiguro’s heady prose along the way.  It’s not a Christian worldview, but his points are ones that lie downstream from the faith in every way.

    4 Comments

      Adam Baker
      August 16th, 2010 | 9:38 pm | #1

      Wasn’t there a movie a few years back that had more or less the same plot? The Island? That is what I gather from the plot summaries, anyway.

      Truth Unites... and Divides
      August 17th, 2010 | 6:45 am | #2

      “Wasn’t there a movie a few years back that had more or less the same plot? The Island? That is what I gather from the plot summaries, anyway.”

      I remember that movie. Had Ewan McGregor in it.

      This plot also reminds me of that old sci-fi movie that starred Harrison Ford and he’s supposed to kill some clone but falls in love with it. Can’t remember the name of it.

      Craig Payne
      August 17th, 2010 | 10:48 am | #3

      Dear TUAD: My science-fiction sensibilities are bruised severely from the thought that anyone would not remember “Blade Runner.”

      Truth Unites... and Divides
      August 17th, 2010 | 11:38 am | #4

      Oh yeah, that’s the one I was thinking of.

      I was a kid when I saw it and I remember it being a kind of a weird movie with really far-out scenes, psychedelic colors, and a bizarre plot.

      It was kinda revolutionary at the time.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact