Traditional Protestants?! What’s next, square circles?!

If so, it might explain your rather uncharitable view, toward those of differing views.”

You should think about how your own words apply to you.

This kind of self-talk is good for you, Bret.

I think the issue is this. you believe that you possess the absolute Truth, with God completely on your side. Therefore, I think you feel justified in denouncing anyone, or anything, that does not comform to your conception of the “Truth”.

This has also turned rather amusing. Are you the type of Christian, who believes, that the only criterion, for being saved, is belief, in Jesus Christ, and it doesn’t matter what your moral behavior is?

If so, it might explain your rather uncharitable view, toward those of differing views.

You need to apologize for demanding an apology.

YOU need to apologize.

Answer the earlier questions.

I think you’ll say, as you’ve said before, that you were pointing to an example, of where you don’t interpret the Bible literally. Fine. Why not just say that you don’t believe that that particular passage, should, in your view, be interpreted metaphorically? Why ADD the clearly offensive “vampire” and “cannibal” comparision? You have every right to disagree with the Catholic doctrine, obviously, but why would you deliberately try to offend?

Sure there is. Who are you kidding? Yourself?

The fact that you’re ranting speaks volumes.

Instead, answer the questions I posed to you earlier.

So do you really believe that 99% of biologists are either deluded, or part of a conspiracy?

It was meant to imply that the Catholic belief, that Christ is literally in the the wafers and wine, as equivalant to being a vampire, and/or cannibal. Why not word it differently. you don’t give him enough credit: his intent, was to be offensive, and he succeeded.