SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • teleologist: Thanks you for the opportunity to express our opinions with the time that we had. Tongues will cease,...
  • Orthodoxdj: As Tolkien said to Lewis as they parted on that fateful night in Oxford, “Goodbye.”
  • Livingston Dell: I didn’t always comment as frequently as I had liked to on these articles, but I always...
  • Nikolai Volk: You know, we had a hell of a run in these comment sections. I’ve had many a great discussion with...
  • David Strunk: Hey Joe, I also appreciated what you guys did here, and always had this blog on my RSS feed to see the...
  • Amy K. Hall: Thanks for starting the blog, Joe. It was an honor to be included.
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 9:00 AM

    At Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan, the inaugural meeting of the World Communion of Reformed Churches (WCRC) is taking place this week. This organization brings together two predecessor ecumenical organizations, the World Alliance of Reformed Churches (WARC) and the Reformed Ecumenical Council (REC). The Presbyterian Church in Canada has been a member of the former, while the Christian Reformed Church has been part of both and a founding member of the latter, once known as the Reformed Ecumenical Synod. The Acton Institute’s Jordan Ballor expresses his view on the new body’s social vision, as articulated in the Accra Confession: Unity or Unanimity at Reformed Council? Jeffrey Japinga responds to Ballor: Intersection of economics and faith is valid subject for church council, to which Ballor replies: Confessing the Wrong Side. This is an exchange worth following.

    With the Uniting General Council of the new WCRC is still in progress, I will not speculate as to the status of statements and documents previously adopted by the predecessor organizations. That said, if the Accra Confession does indeed represent the social witness of the converging bodies, it is worth commenting on, because it is not dissimilar to other statements approved by denominational and ecumenical bodies alike. At some point I will write more fully about the Accra Confession. For the moment I will simply indicate two areas of agreement and two reservations I have with the statement, beginning with the former. First, I applaud the document for recognizing that the Christian faith has social, economic and political implications. Second, it is correct to note that God is a God of justice. Now the down side. First, I agree with Ballor that engaging in policy debates in the public square is not the primary task of the institutional church. Second, it’s not clear to me that this document should be labelled a confession at all. More to come.

    2 Comments

      Tweets that mention The Accra Confession and the WCRC » Evangel | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
      June 23rd, 2010 | 9:35 am | #1

      [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jordan Ballor, CLP. CLP said: David Koyzis on the #Accra Confession and the #WCRC at #Evangel http://bit.ly/cCoJ7C #economics [...]

      Albert
      June 23rd, 2010 | 10:29 am | #2

      Dr. Koyzis, I do think this discussion needs to be had (undoubtedly once again) in our generations, particularly with regard to the first point with which you and Jordan Ballor agree, but which I think is less clear.

      I took a look at the overview of the Accra “Confession” and can say that the actual content of the “Confession” leaves much to be desired, though that is not to say the effort for an institutional church, as such, to examine current economic regime in a critical light is illegitimate.

      As my quotes indicate, I am wary of their use of the term “Confession,” which to be fair to them, they acknowledge is “not a doctrinal confession like the Heidelberg Catechism or Westminster Confession.” Why not use “declaration” as in “The Barmen Declaration”? That would seem more appropriate at this point.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact