David:
Michael New, a political scientist specializing in abortion statistics, explains why T.R. Reid’s “analysis is superficial and unconvincing.”
Ramesh Ponnuru calls Reid’s op-ed “absurd,” says that Professor New’s critique is “too kind,” and shows that the only two pieces of evidence offered in support of this view are both “pathetically weak.”
Follow the links to see their counter-arguments.
March 15th, 2010 | 4:56 pm | #1
Ramesh Ponnuru is my homeboy.
March 15th, 2010 | 5:06 pm | #2
Frank,
Do you have a man-crush on him, too?
March 15th, 2010 | 10:22 pm | #3
Sorry….I couldn’t even finish reading the summaries above because my eyes hurt from the faithdome.org ad on the right side of the page. I didn’t think the prosperity gospel was welcome in these parts ;)
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact