SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • teleologist: Thanks you for the opportunity to express our opinions with the time that we had. Tongues will cease,...
  • Orthodoxdj: As Tolkien said to Lewis as they parted on that fateful night in Oxford, “Goodbye.”
  • Livingston Dell: I didn’t always comment as frequently as I had liked to on these articles, but I always...
  • Nikolai Volk: You know, we had a hell of a run in these comment sections. I’ve had many a great discussion with...
  • David Strunk: Hey Joe, I also appreciated what you guys did here, and always had this blog on my RSS feed to see the...
  • Amy K. Hall: Thanks for starting the blog, Joe. It was an honor to be included.
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Sunday, March 21, 2010, 8:12 PM

    On March 15th, Catholic Archbishop Charles J. Chaput wrote an article for “On the Square.” He said the Senate health care reform bill is “gravely flawed. It does not meet minimum moral standards in at least three important areas: the exclusion of abortion funding and services; adequate conscience protections for health care professionals and institutions; and the inclusion of immigrants.”

    He also said: “Democratic Congressman Bart Stupak and a number of his Democratic colleagues have shown extraordinary character in pushing for good health care reform while resisting attempts to poison it with abortion-related entitlements and other bad ideas that have nothing to do with real health care.”

    This afternoon a last-minute deal won over anti-abortion Democrats, ensuring that the House of Representatives would pass the health care reform bill. President Barack Obama has promised to sign an executive order that superficially and probably ineffectually addresses two of the three important areas that Bishop Chaput mentioned above: the exclusion of abortion funding and services and adequate conscience protections for health care professionals and institutions. See text of executive order on abortion. I wonder if Bishop Chaput still regards the bill as “gravely flawed.” I wonder if he still regards Congressman Stupak as showing “extraordinary character.”

    In an ironic twist of our culture wars, the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Organization for Women are both opposed to the last-minute deal with anti-abortion Democrats. In the case of the former group, they are opposed because they wanted the restrictions to be part of a bill rather than an executive order, knowing that an executive order cannot trump law. In the case of the latter group, they are opposed because they claim President Obama negotiated “health care on the backs of women,” betraying his pro-abortion campaign promises.

    My opinion about the deal is revealed in the title of this blog post. So-called anti-abortion Democrats should not be congratulated for being crucial players in the passage of a bill that leaves the unborn child vulnerable; their negotiation with the Obama administration reveals cowardice, not courage. In less than twenty-four hours, Congressman Stupak was lionized as an anti-abortion hero and then pilloried in the House chamber as a “baby killer.” Should he – or we – be surprised? Convictions about the sanctity of life must run deeper than advocacy for any president’s legacy or any political party’s agenda.

    In addition to not meeting the “minimum moral standards” mentioned by Bishop Chaput, the health care reform bill has negative consequences that will significantly affect the economy, health care, medicine, role of government, American enterprise, and free society. Elected representatives have substituted their will for our will, brazenly ignoring the majority opposition from Americans. Mark your calendars: today the government got bigger while the citizen got smaller.

    NOTE: Comments left without a person’s first and last name will be deleted.

    Speech from House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH)

    Speech from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

    6 Comments

      Don Guillermo
      March 22nd, 2010 | 3:08 am | #1

      Q: What does “Judas” mean in Hebrew?
      A: Barack.

      Chris Thompson
      March 22nd, 2010 | 4:19 am | #2

      Well, it’s probably better than the status quo, which is the only fair standard of comparison at this point. Undoubtedly this all very painful for politically motivated conservatives, but this is not a time to be poor losers. It’s a time to congratulate the “Yes We Can” crowd, as they’ve just accomplished what many believed impossible. So, congratulations! And congratulations to the 32 million who will soon have access to health care!

      david carlson
      March 22nd, 2010 | 7:02 am | #3

      Obama said he was going to do it, and he did it (even though many commentators said health care reform was dead) – makes him more like Jesus, really (if your going to get all metaphorical)

      Ben Nelson now – feel free to talk about his 30 pieces of silver

      Bob Sacamento
      March 22nd, 2010 | 10:28 am | #4

      So-called anti-abortion Democrats should not be congratulated for being crucial players in the passage of a bill that leaves the unborn child vulnerable; their negotiation with the Obama administration reveals cowardice, not courage.

      Christopher Benson,

      Yes, and thanks for saying so.

      Chris Thompson,

      Well, it’s probably better than the status quo, which is the only fair standard of comparison at this point.

      I’m sure you sincerely believe this statement, along with the rest of your comment, but it is still patently false, along with the rest of your comment. Please educate yourself.

      There. In the interests of what charity I can muster here, I am done.

      steve hays
      March 22nd, 2010 | 10:29 am | #5

      Chris Thompson

      “And congratulations to the 32 million who will soon have access to health care!”

      This is not about giving people access to healthcare. This is about forcing everyone to buy health insurance whether or not they need it or want it.

      And since the program is fiscally unsustainable, this is about depriving everyone of healthcare in the long run–beginning with seniors.

      Bob Sacamento
      March 23rd, 2010 | 3:02 pm | #6

      Saw an intersting three-way inteview on Fox — Megan Kelly talking to both a pro-life and a pro-choice activist. The one thing the two of them could agree on was, whether it makes you happy or sad, Obama’s executive order means absolutely nothing.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact