SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • teleologist: Thanks you for the opportunity to express our opinions with the time that we had. Tongues will cease,...
  • Orthodoxdj: As Tolkien said to Lewis as they parted on that fateful night in Oxford, “Goodbye.”
  • Livingston Dell: I didn’t always comment as frequently as I had liked to on these articles, but I always...
  • Nikolai Volk: You know, we had a hell of a run in these comment sections. I’ve had many a great discussion with...
  • David Strunk: Hey Joe, I also appreciated what you guys did here, and always had this blog on my RSS feed to see the...
  • Amy K. Hall: Thanks for starting the blog, Joe. It was an honor to be included.
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

    Today our church entertained a special speaker, Sarah Flashing, who provided us with an interesting perspective on euthanasia and eugenics.  One of her central points was to draw the relationship between the two by exampling how they are inter-related.

    When eugenics is promoted it is at the expense of those who are not chosen, those not chosen are put to death.  This happens in the case of sex-selective and feature-selective implantation (genetic screening).  Say you want a child with red hair and green eyes.  You choose that child to be born and then the rest are discarded.  When it comes to human embryos, that situation ends up in death.

    But as a bit of irony, here is something about our family name name.  Mother’s maiden name is Cohen, though that was an adaptation of Cowan.  So we looked up the etymology of the name.  The irony is self-evident:

    This interesting name, widespread in Scotland and Ulster, is an Anglicized form of the old Gaelic MacEoghain or MacEoin. The Gaelic prefix “mac” means “son of”, plus the personal name Eoghan from the old Celtic “Oue(i)n”, well-born, but believed to derive ultimately from the Greek “Eugenious”, “born lucky” or “well-born”.

    Sort of brings to mind the names used in other cultures that related to calling, as is the case in both the OT and NT (eg., Peter & rock).  Now, I’m not going to make a fetish out of this family history as though our family history names led to this moment.  But it is difficult to avoid that little feeling of confirmation in learning this little tidbit.

    2 Comments

      Cheryl
      April 6th, 2010 | 8:14 pm | #1

      How good it was for your church to invite that speaker and inform the congregation. As for finding out about your name – be careful! My half sister started a search like you, and ended up with a gizzilion relatives in Ireland and Scotland, and has traveled twice from Winnipeg Man., to Scotland to meet them. : )

      Jeremy Pierce
      April 10th, 2010 | 11:33 am | #2

      Not all eugenics involves choosing some and leaving others. One method of eugenics is simply modifying what’s there. If they find a genetic mechanism to stop disorders like autism from developing, and parents use it, it is indeed a kind of eugenics. But it doesn’t leave anyone behind. It simply improves the child already present (on the assumption that the change is an improvement, although that’s a controversial assumption).

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact