SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “For those of us who are devotees of both history and literature, we recognize,...
  • Raymond Takashi Swenson: One of the most quoted verses in the NT us John 3:16, but it is part of an argument Jesus...
  • Hodge: Volk, I wanted to point out that I ignored your arguments because they weren’t arguments. They were...
  • Constantine: This was hardly an innovation of Augustine. After all, the resurrected Christ made this plain on the...
  • jason taylor: The Federal government is not a village. Nor is pointing that out merely being pedantic. A real village...
  • Michael Snow: Kittel, TDNT: s.v. “kephale” The LXX adopts the Greek usage for “head”R...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Sunday, February 14, 2010, 7:56 PM

    Valentine’s Day shouldn’t come and go without at least a mention. There’s enough myth going around about the origin of the holiday to commission a scholar to cut to the chase. This was done by the Teaching Company a good while back, I took some notes, and herewith the gritty details:

    Who’s Valentine? There were some 13 Valentines in the ancient Church, two of which were most popular, both having been martyred on February 14th (probably, therefore, the same person). In the 6th-9th century their martyr accounts were written. Strangely, they have a history of curing epilepsy.

    Why then the courtship connection? In the late 14th century Chaucer wrote four poems called The Parliament of Fowls. The poems took Valentine’s Day as their theme, and in them the narrator witnesses birds gathering on that day to choose their mates. Other poets borrowed the motif, probably from Chaucer. Thus by the late 14th/early 15th century Valentine and courtship were linked. Christine de Pizan et. al. would later try their hands at Valentine’s Day poems.

    Researchers assumed that Chaucer chose Valentine’s Day because of the link with courtship, but there is no link between the actual St. Valentine feast on February 14th and courtship that scholars can find before Chaucer. Up until then the St. Valentine cult was only linked with epilepsy cures.

    Historian Henry Ansgar Kelly has suggested that the link came about because Chaucer was thinking of Valentine of Genoa, a saint celebrated in a local Italian festival in early May. Chaucer had traveled to Genoa in 1373, and during his traveling he came across the feast day. This must have been what he had in mind when he wrote his very Springtime reflections on courtship. Contemporaries misread the poem, and associated it with the more popular St. Valentine’s day of February 14th.

    Then what’s all this “Lupercalia” business? In Alban Butler’s popular Lives of the Saints (18th century), the letter of Pope Gelasius denouncing the Roman feast of Lupercalia (celebrated on February 15th) is wrongly thought to have led to the pagan festival being “replaced” by the Pope with St. Valentine’s Day. Though that interesting connection is commonly made, it’s a bogus one.

    Behind Santa Claus is St. Nicholas, behind the Easter Bunny is an empty tomb, and behind candy hearts are a host of martyrs and a string of healed epileptics. The leviathan of truth swims beneath the innocent surface of what seems just a kiddy-pool of American kitsch. Glorious, quirky, messy Christendom. Count me in.

    [cross-posted at millinerd]

    Comments are closed.