SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Randy McDonald: Tom Gilson: “There is instructive value in having laws like anti-sodomy: they say that we as a...
  • Randy McDonald: De Las Casas: “Many supporters of SSM don’t realize that using the word “marriage” for gay...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: Q: “Nikolai Volk, Do you affirm Scripture’s teachings that same-sex behavior is...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “Thanks for this conversation… it’s been quite helpful in drawing out the key...
  • Nikolai Volk: Understood, Tom. I definitely agree with you here, and I’m glad that you recognize the importance...
  • Jake Belder: Conflict within churches and between Christians is an unfortunate reality owing to our sinfulness. But...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Monday, February 1, 2010, 9:00 AM

    We love our stuff, and that makes God less-real to us. We want our relationship with God to be completely under our control the way all our stuff — everything from cars to boxes of paper — is under our control. And because Jesus is not in your face the way this blog is in your face, he’s just not that real. Because Jesus doesn’t actually sit in the car with you on the way to work, he’s not real. Because, unlike your boss at work, or your spouse, Jesus will not call to check up on you and give you the angry eyebrows when you are doing something other than you’re supposed to be doing, he’s just not that real. We are exactly like Oprah. And in that respect, we are exactly like Peter — the Peter whom Jesus called “Satan”. We want the relationship with God which we want, and we don’t want to see it from His perspective because He’s not actually completely real to us.

    This is why wrapping your brain around the statement “this Jesus who was crucified” is so important. The kind of God we want, if we are honest with ourselves, is the one who gives us all kinds of things. For Oprah, it’s freedom and self-esteem; for Peter, it was a king he could trust (and who would maybe make him a dignitary of some kind, rather than a fisherman); for me, it’s a God who doesn’t care if I can’t park my car in the garage because I’m hoarding trash.

    You know what kind of God you want. He might be a God who lets you mate all the socks in the dryer; it might be a God who will make you skinny and sexy (sic); it might be a God who tells great jokes; it might be a God who wants you to have your best life right now, whatever that might mean; It might be a God who hates alcohol, or who loves alcohol; it might be a God who would make every day Sunday so there would be sports on all the time — and that’s an interesting one, because that God would make a kind of local assembly you could really wrap your arms around. You’d wear that God’s Cheesehead, right? That’s a God who would be real. But if we look at Jesus, and we say he has something to do with God, we have to see that the God to whom Jesus points wanted Jesus to be crucified and therefore wants something which we cannot imagine on our own. What God sees are real, and necessary, we somehow can’t grasp on our own.

    Which brings us back to what Peter was talking about 40 days after Jesus was crucified. “You killed him, and that’s what God wanted,” Peter said, “But God raised him up from the dead, and we are all witnesses to that fact. So you should know for certain that Jesus, whom you crucified, is both Lord and Christ!”

    Whenever I say this to people, I know it sounds like crazy talk. I know it sounds like I’m saying something like, “Lex Luthor for President!” But the first reason it sounds that crazy is plain: the only way the demand to “know for certain” makes any sense at all is if Jesus is real the same way Barack Obama is real, or Oprah Winfrey is real, or that you are real. If Jesus is real, then we can talk about what He has done or what He requires. But that is actually the appeal Peter was making in the first place: Real Jesus was crucified, and now his tomb is really empty — and that changes everything! King David is dead, but Jesus is alive — and if Jesus is alive, …

    Peter is saying that this empty tomb changes the way we have to see the world.

    4 Comments

      David Paul Regier
      February 1st, 2010 | 10:08 am | #1

      This is a good series.

      Rachael Starke
      February 1st, 2010 | 4:42 pm | #2

      This is a great series, even though at first I didn’t get it, which had me panicking, because perhaps that meant I didn’t have ears to hear!! I’ve been mentally ruminating on your last post because at first, it seemed to fly in the face of some other things which I’ve been thinking out loud about at my own blog and in my personal study, namely, that Jesus is in me.

      Right now.

      He has been since the day He saved me. But I didn’t know that for a long time. I thought regeneration was this kind of external zapping with a wand so that now everything about God makes sense and you’re now able, on your new own, to do everything God says all the time. And if you don’t, there’s something really wrong with you. You probably aren’t saved.

      I didn’t understand that Jesus was in me. So when I read this at first, I thought “wait!!! He does see me! He does give me the angry eyebrows through His word, etc. etc.” I think what you’re trying to say is, we need to act like that’s true. Because it is.

      All those days with newborns and dirty laundry and exhaustion where I would say to God with tears “This cannot be my life!!” were just like Peter saying the same to Jesus.

      This post is making me feel like I just skipped ahead a couple chapters in the sanctification manual; I need to go back and rethink some things more slowly, but when I’m done I’m going to be right back here again, I think.

      In the meantime, it’s Monday and there’s more laundry to do. Better get to it. :)

      Frank Turk
      February 1st, 2010 | 6:23 pm | #3

      It’s sad that this series is getting bumped by other things on this blog.

      David Paul Regier
      February 1st, 2010 | 7:10 pm | #4

      Well, Frank, blogging is only semi-real. Especially mondo-group blogging.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact