<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Ethics, Law, and Pragmatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/01/on-ethics-law-and-pragmatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/01/on-ethics-law-and-pragmatism/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Brendemuehl</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/01/on-ethics-law-and-pragmatism/#comment-5087</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Brendemuehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=3254#comment-5087</guid>
		<description>Jason,
Then perhaps I misunderstood.  When you, as I read it, indicated that &lt;a href=&quot;http://positiveliberty.com/2010/01/strict-scrutiny-and-same-sex-marriage.html/comment-page-1#comment-626128&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;common law scrutiny was pragmatic&lt;/a&gt;, then followed with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://positiveliberty.com/2010/01/a-decision-tree-for-levels-of-constitutional-scrutiny-with-admittedly-biased-commentary.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;decision tree&lt;/a&gt;, it seemed consistent to conclude the practical pragmatism of the method.  If that is not the case, could you enlighten me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
Then perhaps I misunderstood.  When you, as I read it, indicated that <a href="http://positiveliberty.com/2010/01/strict-scrutiny-and-same-sex-marriage.html/comment-page-1#comment-626128" rel="nofollow">common law scrutiny was pragmatic</a>, then followed with the <a href="http://positiveliberty.com/2010/01/a-decision-tree-for-levels-of-constitutional-scrutiny-with-admittedly-biased-commentary.html" rel="nofollow">decision tree</a>, it seemed consistent to conclude the practical pragmatism of the method.  If that is not the case, could you enlighten me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kuznicki</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2010/01/on-ethics-law-and-pragmatism/#comment-5080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kuznicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=3254#comment-5080</guid>
		<description>I have not said that my decision tree was pragmatic.  That&#039;s a characterization that you&#039;ve offered, and I&#039;ve rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not said that my decision tree was pragmatic.  That&#8217;s a characterization that you&#8217;ve offered, and I&#8217;ve rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
