Given what’s been said about me here after declining to sign the MD, I’m fearful to post anything that’s not a robust affirmation of the Gospel of jesus Christ which also includes all people at all time who have ever walked in the shadow of any post-Nicene tradition, but brave men face their fears.
And to allay your fears: no, this is not a post about how other post-Nicene traditions are not the Gospel.
This is a post about this bit of news from Copenhagen, reported in Australia.
If we want to talk about false gospels, let’s talk about that one.
December 17th, 2009 | 4:54 pm | #1
It seems to me, and I could be really wrong since it’s just my limited vantage point, but there seems to be a correlation between those opposed to Hugo Chavez and those opposed to the co-belligerency agreement between RC’s, EO’s, and Protestants in the Manhattan Declaration.
December 17th, 2009 | 5:31 pm | #2
Hijacked without even one decent comment.
That’s ugly.
December 17th, 2009 | 5:42 pm | #3
And incomprehensible!
December 17th, 2009 | 7:10 pm | #4
In the spirit of anti-Turk posts:
1) Frank Turk posted a link to a blog post about Hugo Chavez
2) Frank Turk must like Hugo Chavez.
3) If Frank Turk likes Hugo Chavez, then Hugo Chavez must like Frank Turk, but
4) Hugo Chavez doesn’t like anybody, so
5) Frank Turk and Hugo Chavez are the same person!
December 17th, 2009 | 9:05 pm | #5
Better luck next time.
December 17th, 2009 | 9:45 pm | #6
I’ll bite, since no one else seems to be leaping on this.
I completely agree that Chavez preaches a false gospel. In fact, I love how Whitaker Chambers put it:
Chavez is simply preaching another version of the glorification of man. And not a particularly subtle one, either.
December 18th, 2009 | 12:19 am | #7
Will President Obama give him another warm embrace?
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact