SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Randy McDonald: Tom Gilson: “There is instructive value in having laws like anti-sodomy: they say that we as a...
  • Randy McDonald: De Las Casas: “Many supporters of SSM don’t realize that using the word “marriage” for gay...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: Q: “Nikolai Volk, Do you affirm Scripture’s teachings that same-sex behavior is...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “Thanks for this conversation… it’s been quite helpful in drawing out the key...
  • Nikolai Volk: Understood, Tom. I definitely agree with you here, and I’m glad that you recognize the importance...
  • Jake Belder: Conflict within churches and between Christians is an unfortunate reality owing to our sinfulness. But...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Saturday, December 5, 2009, 12:29 AM

    Blame this post on Roberts Wesleyan College. There I drank too deeply at the well of John Wesley and so developed what one Calvinist colleague called a case of election envy. . .

    Some of my best friends are Calvinists and I feel that they are too often stereotyped, judged, and labeled. Most of you, my non-Calvinist readers, do not understood them or their funny ways. The rest of you, the other three readers, Calvinists, are, for some reason, constantly irritated with me.

    Since this could not be my fault, surely not, I have decided you need cheering up for Christmas.

    Knowing the Objects of Our Compassion: the Dour versus Other Calvinists

    First we must define who it is that needs cheering up: the dour Calvinist.

    It is fashionable to say that most Calvinists are not dour, which is a sure sign that they are. Nobody accuses Katie Couric of being dour . . . and compare Couric to John Calvin.

    Some Calvinists are Couric Calvinists and they are mostly not really Calvinists, but urban Presbyterians or former Pentecostals that teach at Calvin College. Other Calvinists are dour and they are usually upset with Presbyterians and Calvin College.

    If you have to say you are not dour, then you are a dour Calvinist.

    There are also the cool new Calvinists who are neither Couric-y or dour, but are feisty and have put the fun and the mental back in fundamentalism. . . except when they give in to their inner Cromwell and sack a web site or two that has the temerity to argue badly.

    I shall have nothing else to say about the cool Calvinists since cheerful, right-minded, wholesome people are much harder to describe than the illusory Calvinists of straw I have invented out of nothing for the purposes of parody.

    Let us recapitulate for the non-Calvinist. There are three basic types of Calvinists: the dour, the Couric-y, and the Cool. The “dour” is the Calvinist of stereotype and he is our concern here.

    How To Cheer a Dour Calvinist

    When thinking how to give my Calvinist friends good cheer for the Holidays, I thought of finding them a church they could split over neo-lapsarianism or one of the other things the kids are into these days.

    When dour Calvinists wish to cheer up, they split their own churches. This compares favorably to Catholics who conquer other churches in Crusades that feature swords and not Billy Graham and the Orthodox who haven’t built a new church since the Great Schism, but might soon.

    Couric-y Calvinists try to corrupt the disillusioned young of dour Calvinists, while cool Calvinists make converts . . . some of whom go too far and become the new dour Calvinists.

    It is the circle of Calvinist life.

    This is so unfair to the dour Calvinist, but since they accept it that way, let me try to complain for them. Call me the Job for the dour Calvinists.

    Roman Catholics have grand cathedrals, Wesleyans awesome hymns, the Orthodox centuries of iconography, but Calvinists must content themselves with knowing that by God’s foresight they alone of all those who called on Christ got an answer. . . though maybe not one they like.

    The dour Calvinists are, therefore, almost as if by definition a gloomy lot. They are Pilgrims slouching toward Geneva under the burden of the banner of truth. Usually they spend their time profitably engaged in schism, inventing haggis, reading Sproul for fun, and inventing worries about whether their attempts not to earn their salvation are in fact a way of earning their salvation. It is a sad thing if a man discovers that despite his best efforts he has been hit by the semi in semi-Pelegian.


    Christmas and the Dour Calvinist

    And so Christmas comes and the false cheer of the totally depraved jangles the nerves of the elect.

    Holidays are hard on the serious minded and Thanksgiving starts the problem. Quite unfairly, G.K. Chesterton, that noted papist oft quoted by Calvinists, remarked that Thanksgiving was a national holiday in both England and America. Thanksgiving in America celebrates God’s bountiful gifts and in England God’s gift to Europe in sending the Puritans to America.

    This is the sort of slander dour Calvinists face with the joy of a Dimmesdale.

    I have noted that saying, “Cheer up!” has little impact on the deeply dour and so I have gone the extra mile, because I am (I am told by dour Calvinists) merely working out my own salvation. This post is an attempt to earn favor and merit . . . or something.

    Because of this hope, I have decided to produce a serious list of reasons for my Calvinist friends to be jolly this Holiday. I have limited myself to ten, because that is the number God willed me to pick.

    Reasons for Dour Calvinist Cheer

    You should be cheerful if you are a Calvinist:

    I. . . . because God may not have chosen you for the team, but He did choose Al Mohler and John Piper and both guys are smarter individually than John Spong and the whole Anglican communion collectively . . . at least since the death of C.S. Lewis taken by God in the knowledge that John Piper and Al Mohler were on the horizon.

    II . . . because Calvinists no longer have to ban Christmas.

    III . . .because Oliver Cromwell is still dead, but the Second Coming is one day closer.

    IV . . . because the Pythons had heard of the Inquisition but ignored Servetus.

    V. . . because you need only memorize TULIP and not something like POINSETTIA.

    VI . . . given her birthplace, there is a better than a fifty percent chance the Swiss Miss is a Calvinist.

    VII . . . because you can have alcohol in your wassail and smoke cigars while reading Edwards.

    VIII . . . because Wesleyan-types take the risks and make the converts, but when the converts hit middle-age Calvinists acquire them and their tithe.

    IX . . . Rembrandt was Calvinist and El Greco wasn’t.

    X . . . Francis Schaeffer may have worn knickers, but he never dressed like Benny Hinn.

    BONUS for Sober Jollification:

    Discussion of “Total Depravity” might attract non-Christians confused about content to Wednesday service.

    Doubly Predestined BONUS:

    Calvinists venerate no saints thus avoiding any icons of John Knox. No future Calvinist can preach a sermon more dour than this one.

    Merry Christmas, Joe, Frank, and all you other cool Calvinists.

    22 Comments

      Douglas Westfall
      December 5th, 2009 | 1:26 am | #1

      Thank you, I’ve also always enjoyed this blog post http://purgatorio1.blogspot.com/2005/12/help-im-going-hyper.html

      with the title Top 25 signs you’re becoming hyper-calivinist. But thanks to you I may have a new favorite.

      millinerd
      December 5th, 2009 | 2:00 am | #2

      If Calvinists wish to preserve any vestige of cheer in number IX they must avoid this extraordinary exhibition, currently on view next to St. Patrick’s in New York:

      http://www.onassisusa.org/occ.art.htm

      I tidied up the kitchenette, I tuned the old banjo … « P e r ∙ C r u c e m ∙ a d ∙ L u c e m
      December 5th, 2009 | 4:42 am | #3

      [...] John Mark Reynolds posts Ten Reasons for Calvinists to be Cheerful This Christmas [...]

      Frank Turk
      December 5th, 2009 | 9:05 am | #4

      Because we do not celebrate Festivus, but daily celebrate the Airing of Grievances, I’d like to set the record straight on a few things:

      ITEM – I am offended that JMR claims Calvinists do not have “iconography”. I can disprove his claim by pointing to the sales of this on-line t-shirt shop. I demand a retraction, a correction, and an apology to all my customers.

      ITEM – Calvinists don’t split churches: God does. We are merely mediate causes, merely sinners in the hand of an angry God. And I can tell you: He’s mad about this post, so your church better watch out.

      ITEM – A fight will break out in this comment thread shortly over whether CS Lewis was actually a Christian at all, based on the final salvation of Emeth the Calormene in the Last Battle. That ought to learn ya for bringing it up “Calvinists” and “CS Lewis” in the first place.

      Rev. Paul T. McCain
      December 5th, 2009 | 9:23 am | #5

      Well, I am sure there are a lot of reasons for Calvinists to be cheery, but then there is that little detail about the dreary doctrine of double predestination, aka, “Jesus loves me, this I know, but you? Not so much.”

      : )

      Jeremy Pierce
      December 5th, 2009 | 9:51 am | #6

      What about those of us who are fully dour but also get accused of not being genuine Calvinists for accepting the views like compatibilism, infralapsarianism, and language like “sufficient for all but efficient for only the elect”?

      Steve
      December 5th, 2009 | 10:19 am | #7

      Three cheers for Roberts Wesleyan College!

      I was a graduate teaching assistant there (while a grad student at Northeastern Seminary) for a Roman Catholic historian, interestingly enough. And while it is the birthplace of Free Methodism and a hotbed of Wesleyan thought (of which I am an advocate), I’ll always remember one of my professors, a thoroughgoing Free Methodist, always liked to comment that one of his favorite theologians was, yes, John Calvin.

      Anthony Mator
      December 5th, 2009 | 10:42 am | #8

      Calvinists need their own bumper sticker: “Jesus Probably Hates You.”

      John Mark Reynolds
      December 5th, 2009 | 11:58 am | #9

      Frank Turk: a Calvinist amongst sheep.

      John Mark Reynolds
      December 5th, 2009 | 12:07 pm | #10

      Hey Frank!

      Is the Cromwell t-shirt the Christian equivalent of the Che shirt? You can celebrate a killer and regicide with style!

      May the prayer of Charles Stuart, king and martyr, be on you this Christ Mass,

      John Mark

      Collin Brendemuehl
      December 5th, 2009 | 1:40 pm | #11

      Continuing Anthony’s thought:
      Hyper Calvinists: God has no feelings for anyone in particular.
      Classic Calvinists: I no idea how God feels about you personally.
      Soft Calvinists: God loves you, but for the life of me I can’t figure out why.
      Arminians: God loves everyone, but only because we dislike Calvinists so much.
      Rome: God loves everyone. Through us alone.
      Socinians: The idea of God loves everyone.
      Kant: God’s love exists out there, somewhere, sort of. But I’m really not certain.
      Adrian Monk: God’s love may exist. Wait. I could be wrong now.
      Nietzsche: We killed the love of God. Now we must pay.
      Liberals: God loves everyone. Ethically, that is. But not really.
      Political Liberals: God loves everyone who is self-loathing enough to pay higher taxes.

      Coyle
      December 5th, 2009 | 2:42 pm | #12

      “Some of my best friends are Calvinists…”
      Classic :)
      Can I be a dour Calvinist when it comes to the city of man and a Couric Calvinist when it comes to the City of God? Or would that make me a Luther…

      Frank Turk
      December 5th, 2009 | 3:28 pm | #13

      Just for historical accuracy, the t-shirt shop had humble beginnings. I originally had two designs: Calvin and Luther. Then I started getting requests for this one and that puritan and so on, and finally I had a contest at TeamPyro where the one who suggested the design that sold the most would get a free shirt.

      Paid for Christmas that year.

      The rest is history.

      Welcome to suburbansavior.com | Suburban Savior
      December 6th, 2009 | 12:51 am | #14

      [...] And if you still want to hang around here – something for your reading (HT: First Things Journal): [...]

      David Wayne
      December 6th, 2009 | 4:52 pm | #15

      Note to Anthony Mator – we dour calvinists aren’t that cruel, our bumper sticker says “Jesus might love you, but then again, who knows?”

      John Mark Reynolds
      December 6th, 2009 | 5:03 pm | #16

      Dear “Jolly”blogger,

      You would never see a Wesleyan called “jollyblogger” because jolliness is promised to them by John 3:16.

      John Mark

      David Wayne
      December 6th, 2009 | 5:24 pm | #17

      er, I meant to say that our bumper sticker says “Smile, Jesus might love you!”

      David Wayne
      December 6th, 2009 | 5:26 pm | #18

      Can’t a Wesleyan just choose to be “jolly” whenever he wishes? We Calvinists can’t unless God compels us to be jolly.

      John Mark Reynolds
      December 6th, 2009 | 5:53 pm | #19

      No, David. I am sorry to say you are clearly wrong.

      Your friend,

      John Mark

      Nerdy Theological Humor: Why Dour Calvinists Can Be Cheerful This Christmas | Caffeinated Thoughts
      December 6th, 2009 | 7:52 pm | #20

      [...] Ten reasons given by John Mark Reynolds, and being a Calvinist I found it quite funny.  But then again, I’m the cool kind, not the dour straw man stereotype he pokes fun at. You should be cheerful if you are a Calvinist: [...]

      David Wayne
      December 6th, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #21

      John Mark,

      Nuh-uh . . .

      Your friend,
      David

      John Mark Reynolds
      December 6th, 2009 | 10:00 pm | #22

      If God wills it, you will.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact