SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “For those of us who are devotees of both history and literature, we recognize,...
  • Raymond Takashi Swenson: One of the most quoted verses in the NT us John 3:16, but it is part of an argument Jesus...
  • Hodge: Volk, I wanted to point out that I ignored your arguments because they weren’t arguments. They were...
  • Constantine: This was hardly an innovation of Augustine. After all, the resurrected Christ made this plain on the...
  • jason taylor: The Federal government is not a village. Nor is pointing that out merely being pedantic. A real village...
  • Michael Snow: Kittel, TDNT: s.v. “kephale” The LXX adopts the Greek usage for “head”R...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Monday, November 16, 2009, 8:14 PM

    There’s a curious and discouraging article in the November 20th Entertainment Weekly magazine about producers’ efforts to “sell” the upcoming film adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road to Christians (by way of their pastors).

    [T]he adaptation of . . . McCarthy’s acclaimed novel about a father (Viggo Mortensen) and son (Kodi Smit-McPhee) traveling through a bleak wasteland is getting the full pitch to Christian audiences . . . Plans include 15 advance screenings for church leaders nationwide, a website featuring free sermon and discussion guides, and a special trailer with extra scenes underscoring the film’s moral message.

    This is a relatively new phenomenon, but it has been successful in the past. The most notable film-to-pulpit crossover is undoubtedly The Passion of the Christ, which held advance screenings for ministers and church groups and later supplied resources for pastor use in sermons and group use in Bible studies. The teams that produced Facing the Giants and Fireproof followed suit, although their crossover into pulpit “advertising” was probably considered more acceptable as the movies were made within the Christian subculture pretty much for the Christian subculture. (Hollywood had lesser success but still some crossovers made with the Narnia adaptations and Evan Almighty.)

    But The Road has no explicit Christian content. It may very well be the best film of all the films ever marketed for pulpit use, but elements reminiscent of Christian themes are the feeblest excuse for church marketing yet. The money quote from the EW article:

    “There are pastors who might not be able to recommend [the film], but would preach about it. I’ve got a pastor right here in Dallas who’s doing a sermon series on the end of the world, and I’m hoping that he’ll incorporate some of the metaphors from this film into his sermons.”

    Ah, Dallas: the epicenter of evangelical awesomeness. ;-)

    Cutting to the chase: The Road will probably be a good movie. Pastors can reference films (and other artifacts of popular arts and culture) till the cows come home. But this is not about helping pastors preach. This is about getting pastors to help impact a film’s box office. None of these guys have impacting evangelical communities as their motivation: they want evangelical communities to impact their bottom lines. We are a market share, a consumer base.

    Resist.

    Any pastor who affords preaching time to help pitch a film because of some preferential treatment and free swag is a sell-out. If that’s you, I hope you have a congregation that cares and calls you out.

    4 Comments

      Sausage « City of God
      November 16th, 2009 | 9:42 pm | #1

      [...] filmmakers eventually going to try to find a way to market every film to Christian audiences? Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Wagon Circling or Circular Firing [...]

      Jeremy Pierce
      November 17th, 2009 | 7:33 am | #2

      The most notable film-to-pulpit crossover is undoubtedly The Passion of the Christ, which held advance screenings for ministers and church groups and later supplied resources for pastor use in sermons and group use in Bible studies. The teams that produced Facing the Giants and Fireproof followed suit, although their crossover into pulpit “advertising” was probably considered more acceptable as the movies were made within the Christian subculture pretty much for the Christian subculture.

      Ironically, if you had to think of one more acceptable on gospel grounds, wouldn’t it be the one that was being promoted for the sake of the gospel rather than the two that were made for Christians?

      Jared C. Wilson
      November 17th, 2009 | 7:59 am | #3

      Jeremy, yep.

      Don Heatley
      November 17th, 2009 | 11:03 am | #4

      I am a bit uncomfortable with “selling” anything from the pulpit. Our church often uses video and movie clips, sometimes from subscribable downloadable resource sites that are designed for churches. I didn’t mind when the movie’s title appeared after the clip. It saved me from having to always answer the congregation’s questions of, “What movie was that from?” Lately, however, some of these resource sites have been featuring clips form yet-to-be-released films. The clips are followed by the film’s title and something like “In Theaters November 30th”. I haven’t used those clips because to me it just seems cheesy.