SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “For those of us who are devotees of both history and literature, we recognize,...
  • Raymond Takashi Swenson: One of the most quoted verses in the NT us John 3:16, but it is part of an argument Jesus...
  • Hodge: Volk, I wanted to point out that I ignored your arguments because they weren’t arguments. They were...
  • Constantine: This was hardly an innovation of Augustine. After all, the resurrected Christ made this plain on the...
  • jason taylor: The Federal government is not a village. Nor is pointing that out merely being pedantic. A real village...
  • Michael Snow: Kittel, TDNT: s.v. “kephale” The LXX adopts the Greek usage for “head”R...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Saturday, November 7, 2009, 12:19 PM

    Whatever you think of health care reform, Christians should unite on keeping federal money from paying for abortion. This is a bi-partisan effort. A Torrey Honors alum who works in Washington in an email:

    Sorry to bother all of you on a crisp autumn morning and sorry for the
    mass email, but I need to break into your early morning reveries with
    politics: please, if you possibly can –  CALL your US Representative and
    ask them to support the pro-life Stupak-Pitts amendment to health care!!

    After months and months of making the case that any kind of health care
    reform should at the very least not increase the amount of lives hurt and
    destroyed by abortion, (no matter whether apart from that you’re for or
    against the current proposal) the Democrat leadership has finally been
    forced to allow a vote. The numbers are exactly on the line with no one
    knowing how such a vote will turn out, so every Member that even remotely
    might vote pro-life on something like the Hyde Amendment or overseas
    funding should be contacted and urged to vote the pro-life position. Right
    now, the vote is expected late today or tomorrow. Especially if you live
    in a district where the Member is not a solid pro-lifer (Souder, Boehner,
    Jordan and Herger for instance are all 100% pro-life), please call and ask
    them to vote for bi-partisan Stupak-Pitts amendment.

    Even if your Representative is solid (or you don’t have one!), please
    pray. This may seem like “just politics as usual”, but if a vote is
    allowed today and it is defeated, it’s over. We lose our case and any
    further influence in the health care debate. If health care reform then
    passes, thousands more will be spent on funding abortion and thousands
    more babies will die – by our hand, with our money. Please God, may it not
    be so.

    If you don’t know your representative go [
    https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml ]here, and once you know
    their name even if you don’t know their direct number, just call (they
    won’t get the emails until too late) 202-224-3121 and the Congressional
    operator will direct you to their office.

    6 Comments

      Bi-Partisan Amendment on Abortion – Justin Taylor
      November 7th, 2009 | 1:49 pm | #1

      [...] John Mark Reynolds: Whatever you think of health care reform, Christians should unite on keeping federal money from paying for abortion. This is a bi-partisan effort. A Torrey Honors alum who works in Washington in an email: Sorry to bother all of you on a crisp autumn morning and sorry for the mass email, but I need to break into your early morning reveries with politics: please, if you possibly can – CALL your US Representative and ask them to support the pro-life Stupak-Pitts amendment to health care!! [...]

      » Call Your Congressman NOW! | Denny Burk
      November 7th, 2009 | 5:40 pm | #2

      [...] Please read the following from John Mark Reynolds: [...]

      Steve
      November 8th, 2009 | 8:56 pm | #3

      Stupak-Pitts passed, but bet good money on the abortion funding provision being added back into any health care bill that passes (no guarantee) the Senate during the conference committee.

      Stupak and some of the pro-life Democrats proved useful to the Speaker during Saturday’s final vote, but loyalty to their cause will fade quickly. Tragic.

      Andrew
      November 8th, 2009 | 10:35 pm | #4

      Is it possible that if the amendment is removed, the whole bill could die in the next stages?

      Albert
      November 9th, 2009 | 11:43 am | #5

      Andrew, practically speaking, the answer is no. If the amendment is removed in the Senate bill and the Senate passes the bill, the bill will not die but simply will go through a “reconciliation” process with the House version that includes the amendment.

      During the reconciliation process, the amendment may or may not be thrown out. But the bill will certainly not die if the amendment is removed in the Senate bill.

      Andrew
      November 9th, 2009 | 12:10 pm | #6

      “But the bill will certainly not die if the amendment is removed in the Senate bill.”

      Forgive my direct questioning, but is this because of legal requirement (now that it has passed in the congress the bill absolutely must pass in some form), or is this your prediction of how the lawmakers are likely to act?