<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Dead Yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Asbenson</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Asbenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-3091</guid>
		<description>Over the last month I&#039;ve been stewing in frustration derived from several recent Patrol articles, many written by friends of mine.  Thank you for this essay.  You&#039;ve well expressed several of the problems I had with those pieces.  My own experience was very different from that supposed to be the norm by the &quot;post-evangelical&quot; authors at Patrol--a thriving, non-denominational church where most people had come to Christ as adults, many out of domestic and substance abuse, and where difficult questions about the nature of Christianity and the Church were not shunned.  It was a very secular community where you could not take things for granted or operate in a sub-culture, club mentality, but had to constantly examine and reaffirm core truths while introducing new believers to the doctrines and history of the Church universal.  The majority of the people there would have no idea who Robertson or Falwell were.  The idea that these men and the failings of some churches in other regions of the nation should somehow reflect on this particular church--or as you said, churches in Asia and throughout the world--as they identify as themselves as &quot;evangelical&quot; strikes me as unjust.  Will we define the nature of a multifaceted movement spanning several hundred years, the work of uncounted saints, by the experience of a partial generation in certain locals over a couple of decades?

Thanks, Nathan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last month I&#8217;ve been stewing in frustration derived from several recent Patrol articles, many written by friends of mine.  Thank you for this essay.  You&#8217;ve well expressed several of the problems I had with those pieces.  My own experience was very different from that supposed to be the norm by the &#8220;post-evangelical&#8221; authors at Patrol&#8211;a thriving, non-denominational church where most people had come to Christ as adults, many out of domestic and substance abuse, and where difficult questions about the nature of Christianity and the Church were not shunned.  It was a very secular community where you could not take things for granted or operate in a sub-culture, club mentality, but had to constantly examine and reaffirm core truths while introducing new believers to the doctrines and history of the Church universal.  The majority of the people there would have no idea who Robertson or Falwell were.  The idea that these men and the failings of some churches in other regions of the nation should somehow reflect on this particular church&#8211;or as you said, churches in Asia and throughout the world&#8211;as they identify as themselves as &#8220;evangelical&#8221; strikes me as unjust.  Will we define the nature of a multifaceted movement spanning several hundred years, the work of uncounted saints, by the experience of a partial generation in certain locals over a couple of decades?</p>
<p>Thanks, Nathan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this. As someone who was a self-styled malcontent as a young evangelical, I watch Patrol as I would a flashback. It is all so predictable. Meanwhile, solid evangelical churches toil away, as the the young angst-ridden journalists try to have it both ways. Can&#039;t be done.

Patrol is Sam Phillips, all over again. Sort of right, and very wrong. In fact, Patrol is the ECUSA all over again, in 20something garb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this. As someone who was a self-styled malcontent as a young evangelical, I watch Patrol as I would a flashback. It is all so predictable. Meanwhile, solid evangelical churches toil away, as the the young angst-ridden journalists try to have it both ways. Can&#8217;t be done.</p>
<p>Patrol is Sam Phillips, all over again. Sort of right, and very wrong. In fact, Patrol is the ECUSA all over again, in 20something garb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDITORIAL: Martin Indulges in Theological Irrelevance &#171; The Patrick Henry Patrician</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>EDITORIAL: Martin Indulges in Theological Irrelevance &#171; The Patrick Henry Patrician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>[...] disputes even after they&#8217;ve graduated. Former Senator Nathan Martin (Class of 2009) has now added his voice to the flood of articles about the &#8220;failure&#8221; of the evangelical movement in the United [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disputes even after they&#8217;ve graduated. Former Senator Nathan Martin (Class of 2009) has now added his voice to the flood of articles about the &#8220;failure&#8221; of the evangelical movement in the United [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>Great article, Nathan!  Thank you for writing this.  History is full of eulogies for faith, but it lives on. (I Kings 19:14-18)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Nathan!  Thank you for writing this.  History is full of eulogies for faith, but it lives on. (I Kings 19:14-18)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Pride</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Pride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>This is good.

Hehe, I had no idea that evangelicalism was supposed to be dead. I must not be an especially bright child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good.</p>
<p>Hehe, I had no idea that evangelicalism was supposed to be dead. I must not be an especially bright child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Not Dead Yet » Evangel &#124; A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Not Dead Yet » Evangel &#124; A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nathan Martin, Alyssa Farah. Alyssa Farah said: awesome article by @nathanmart http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nathan Martin, Alyssa Farah. Alyssa Farah said: awesome article by @nathanmart <a href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/" rel="nofollow">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Ayers</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Ayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>As one of Evangelicalism’s  &quot;brightest children&quot; (what self-indulgent tripe!) I left it&#039;s ranks because of, not in spite of, the Evangelium.

There is a distinction to be made here between those former Evangelicals who break ranks for &quot;post-evangelicalism&quot; and those who actually uproot in order to join &quot;pre-evangelicalism&quot;.

I can&#039;t shake the feeling that the most acute and brilliant thinkers of the ancient Church would embarrass the oh-so-cool and modern post-evangelical terribly with talk of the resurrection, salvation, the Cross, Heaven, and Hell.

Perhaps it&#039;s not really the excesses and failings of Evangelicalism (which are numerous and real) that Patrol Mag is embarrassed by; perhaps it is Christianity itself, with all its latent supernatural realities, that burns them.

Flannery O&#039;Connor&#039;s &quot;The Violent Bear it Away&quot;, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of Evangelicalism’s  &#8220;brightest children&#8221; (what self-indulgent tripe!) I left it&#8217;s ranks because of, not in spite of, the Evangelium.</p>
<p>There is a distinction to be made here between those former Evangelicals who break ranks for &#8220;post-evangelicalism&#8221; and those who actually uproot in order to join &#8220;pre-evangelicalism&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t shake the feeling that the most acute and brilliant thinkers of the ancient Church would embarrass the oh-so-cool and modern post-evangelical terribly with talk of the resurrection, salvation, the Cross, Heaven, and Hell.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s not really the excesses and failings of Evangelicalism (which are numerous and real) that Patrol Mag is embarrassed by; perhaps it is Christianity itself, with all its latent supernatural realities, that burns them.</p>
<p>Flannery O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s &#8220;The Violent Bear it Away&#8221;, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2480</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing, Nathan. Looking forward to following you here instead of Patrol from now on. Love reading your stuff. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing, Nathan. Looking forward to following you here instead of Patrol from now on. Love reading your stuff. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2469</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2469</guid>
		<description>With all due respect, five minutes at Patrol is enough to drive me mad. &quot;Get Over It&quot; rails against evangelical hubris, rigidity, and moral/ethical/cultural certainty, yet the editors speak with their own hubris and cultural certainty. 

Evangelical&#039;s &quot;brightest children are throwing up their hands in record numbers, defecting heavy-heartedly to less temporal churches, or to no church at all.&quot; So, I&#039;d assume that those of us left in evangelicalism are far from the brightest, because if so, we&#039;d have left long ago, right? Is it me, or do I detect some of that hubris that is only supposed to be infecting &quot;modern&quot; evangelicalism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, five minutes at Patrol is enough to drive me mad. &#8220;Get Over It&#8221; rails against evangelical hubris, rigidity, and moral/ethical/cultural certainty, yet the editors speak with their own hubris and cultural certainty. </p>
<p>Evangelical&#8217;s &#8220;brightest children are throwing up their hands in record numbers, defecting heavy-heartedly to less temporal churches, or to no church at all.&#8221; So, I&#8217;d assume that those of us left in evangelicalism are far from the brightest, because if so, we&#8217;d have left long ago, right? Is it me, or do I detect some of that hubris that is only supposed to be infecting &#8220;modern&#8221; evangelicalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Preach it brother.  The trenches are dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach it brother.  The trenches are dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>Wow, I just read the comments in the previous post referenced above between Jonathan and Joe Carter and I&#039;m honestly surprised that this was/is a Christian organization...I just figured they enjoyed talking about religion.  I&#039;m definitely going to plunge into their archives to see how they&#039;ve changed over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just read the comments in the previous post referenced above between Jonathan and Joe Carter and I&#8217;m honestly surprised that this was/is a Christian organization&#8230;I just figured they enjoyed talking about religion.  I&#8217;m definitely going to plunge into their archives to see how they&#8217;ve changed over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>Patrol is &quot;post-evangelical?&quot;  Honestly I came across the site for the first time about two months ago and thought that it was an online magazine for former Christians, or for those struggling with agnosticism.  I read articles about Carolyn Bauer being &quot;Our Kind of Girl,&quot; because she wrote an intelligent, relevant case for atheism.  I read about David Bazan &quot;asking our questions&quot; as he left the faith, and recently I read about someone who thought &quot;reason&quot; forces one to leave their faith behind...while this last article never seemed to rise above the philosophical sophistication of a freshman course.

I honestly had no idea that this was a formerly evangelical or &quot;post-evangelical&quot; Christian publication.  That makes things much more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrol is &#8220;post-evangelical?&#8221;  Honestly I came across the site for the first time about two months ago and thought that it was an online magazine for former Christians, or for those struggling with agnosticism.  I read articles about Carolyn Bauer being &#8220;Our Kind of Girl,&#8221; because she wrote an intelligent, relevant case for atheism.  I read about David Bazan &#8220;asking our questions&#8221; as he left the faith, and recently I read about someone who thought &#8220;reason&#8221; forces one to leave their faith behind&#8230;while this last article never seemed to rise above the philosophical sophistication of a freshman course.</p>
<p>I honestly had no idea that this was a formerly evangelical or &#8220;post-evangelical&#8221; Christian publication.  That makes things much more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>&quot;The writers may not have been offered an intellectual acceptable solution in their own background, but there is a new generation of Christians who do have their own experience, their own story.&quot;

Fantastic point. Just because something doesn&#039;t work for you doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s dead or dying.

I&#039;ve lived all over the country in both urban and rural areas, and one thing I&#039;ve learned is that people everywhere are asking different questions. What &quot;works&quot; in rural Ohio may not work in downtown Dallas or the Pacific Northwest. Yet, it&#039;s not fair to write off an expression of faith that works well in one area but not in another as &quot;dead&quot; or &quot;dying.&quot;

I&#039;m beginning to think that the phrase &quot;American culture&quot; has very little meaning. Sure, Americans have a lot in common--same language, we drive on the right side of the road, etc. But pockets of American sub-cultures have more in common with the people in their own tribe than they do with the larger American culture. What can someone in New York tell us about what is going on in Seattle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The writers may not have been offered an intellectual acceptable solution in their own background, but there is a new generation of Christians who do have their own experience, their own story.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fantastic point. Just because something doesn&#8217;t work for you doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s dead or dying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve lived all over the country in both urban and rural areas, and one thing I&#8217;ve learned is that people everywhere are asking different questions. What &#8220;works&#8221; in rural Ohio may not work in downtown Dallas or the Pacific Northwest. Yet, it&#8217;s not fair to write off an expression of faith that works well in one area but not in another as &#8220;dead&#8221; or &#8220;dying.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that the phrase &#8220;American culture&#8221; has very little meaning. Sure, Americans have a lot in common&#8211;same language, we drive on the right side of the road, etc. But pockets of American sub-cultures have more in common with the people in their own tribe than they do with the larger American culture. What can someone in New York tell us about what is going on in Seattle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Turk</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Turk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Nathan:

you know you did good when there is someone (and it could be anyone) who says, &quot;well, your evidence is my evidence, so we&#039;re both saying the same thing,&quot; even when the other guy is famous for saying something other than what you just said.

Welcome to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan:</p>
<p>you know you did good when there is someone (and it could be anyone) who says, &#8220;well, your evidence is my evidence, so we&#8217;re both saying the same thing,&#8221; even when the other guy is famous for saying something other than what you just said.</p>
<p>Welcome to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Shipe</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/11/not-dead-yet/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Shipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=1549#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>Well done and well said, Nathan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done and well said, Nathan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
