SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Randy McDonald: Tom Gilson: “There is instructive value in having laws like anti-sodomy: they say that we as a...
  • Randy McDonald: De Las Casas: “Many supporters of SSM don’t realize that using the word “marriage” for gay...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: Q: “Nikolai Volk, Do you affirm Scripture’s teachings that same-sex behavior is...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “Thanks for this conversation… it’s been quite helpful in drawing out the key...
  • Nikolai Volk: Understood, Tom. I definitely agree with you here, and I’m glad that you recognize the importance...
  • Jake Belder: Conflict within churches and between Christians is an unfortunate reality owing to our sinfulness. But...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Saturday, November 7, 2009, 11:03 AM

    The circus that is Haggard (Ted, not Merle) launched a new act this week — he’s starting a new church at his home in Colorado.  Just three years since the former megachurch pastor scandalized himself with a male prostitute, he is now ready to “to do something in [their] house to connect with friends.”   Beginning next week, the Haggards will host “prayer meetings,” which in Haggard’s mind could also be called “a church.”

    The trajectory of Haggard’s life is disturbing on many levels (even before the scandal), but perhaps this statement he made to the Colorado Springs Gazette is most telling:

    “For this prayer meeting, I have no goals,” Haggard said. “I have no secret hope that more people will come. I am not driven as I was. Before I focused on the Great Commission. Now I focus on helping other people.”

    Setting aside the claim that he “has no goals,” or the seemingly self-deprecating hopelessness of his group’s prospects, it’s Haggard’s supposed antithesis of the Great Commission and “helping people” that’s most troubling.  How could an evangelical (former National Association of Evangelicals president, no less) see proclamation of the Gospel as being antithetical to “helping people?”

    An evangelical who has lost the fact that the Gospel is our ultimate help should at the very least question his evangelical credentials. Better yet — perhaps he should seek to listen more than lead, and let the Gospel question him.

    2 Comments

      Jeff Doles
      November 7th, 2009 | 11:39 am | #1

      If we look at his statement in a one-dimensional way, ignoring what the man has been through and where he has come from, then it is easy to demolish it with pile-driver logic. But that looks an awful lot like using the wounded for target practice.

      However, I very much doubt he means to oppose the Great Commission to people helping people. But I expect it has much more to do with a sense that, before, his focus was more on Ted Haggard and his grandiose plans, but now he is trying to reach outward for the benefit of others.

      Jugulum
      November 7th, 2009 | 6:34 pm | #2

      Best-case scenario:

      A rich understanding of the Great Commission includes discipleship. There is a way to focus on “sealing the deal” evangelism that leaves out actual discipleship, encouragement, and care. A numbers-based church-growth model.

      Hopefully, he means that he’s expanding his vision of what the Great Commission means.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact