<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should Christians Really Expect?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/10/what-should-christians-really-expect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/10/what-should-christians-really-expect/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calling Their Bluff &#187; Evangel &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/10/what-should-christians-really-expect/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Calling Their Bluff &#187; Evangel &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=635#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] challenged the supposed fairness of our critics.  Malkin challenged the social justice (in this case media justice) movement and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] challenged the supposed fairness of our critics.  Malkin challenged the social justice (in this case media justice) movement and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Hampton</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/10/what-should-christians-really-expect/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>R Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=635#comment-747</guid>
		<description>I saw the episode and, believe it or not, I thought it was done rather well. The picture of Christ happens to be hanging in a half-bath, on a wall beside the toilet. Larry David accidentally &quot;splashes&quot; the painting because the medication he is currently taking causes him to urinate with extreme force. As a result, a very small drop happens to land on Christ&#039;s cheek and trickle downwards - creating a tear-like effect.

Before leaving the bathroom Larry realizes what he has done, but is ethically torn about what to do; is it worse to smear the painting in the process of wiping or to leave it as is? Larry choose the later, which precipitates a chain of events resulting in the friend believing a miracle has happened in her bathroom. So excited by this, she quits her job and buys an RV to travel the country and share with everyone the miracle painting.

So the commentary behind the comedy is about how some Christians witness false &quot;miracles&quot; (like seeing Jesus in a piece of toast) and the extremes to which they are moved by it. 

In otherwords, it&#039;s really about Idolatry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the episode and, believe it or not, I thought it was done rather well. The picture of Christ happens to be hanging in a half-bath, on a wall beside the toilet. Larry David accidentally &#8220;splashes&#8221; the painting because the medication he is currently taking causes him to urinate with extreme force. As a result, a very small drop happens to land on Christ&#8217;s cheek and trickle downwards &#8211; creating a tear-like effect.</p>
<p>Before leaving the bathroom Larry realizes what he has done, but is ethically torn about what to do; is it worse to smear the painting in the process of wiping or to leave it as is? Larry choose the later, which precipitates a chain of events resulting in the friend believing a miracle has happened in her bathroom. So excited by this, she quits her job and buys an RV to travel the country and share with everyone the miracle painting.</p>
<p>So the commentary behind the comedy is about how some Christians witness false &#8220;miracles&#8221; (like seeing Jesus in a piece of toast) and the extremes to which they are moved by it. </p>
<p>In otherwords, it&#8217;s really about Idolatry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judd</title>
		<link>http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/2009/10/what-should-christians-really-expect/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstthings.com/blogs/evangel/?p=635#comment-729</guid>
		<description>You have a valid point. However, there remains some scriptural validity in holding out fairness as important, because scripture does this again and again.

The trick is that Christ knew fairness to be important to his Father, but he submitted to unfairness willingly so that something more glorious could be revealed.

The difference between unbelievers and believers is that unbelievers hold fairness to be an end in itself; i.e. if everybody were just &quot;fair&quot;, the world would be at peace.

Believers know that fairness is merely a means to the true target, which is godliness. So, we strive for fairness so we can be like God, not because we think it is the be-all and end-all.

So when we encounter the PC version of fairness doctrine, we should continue to point it out--not because we&#039;re upset about being mistreated, but because we want to unveil the idolatry of the unbeliever. He claims to hold fairness as his god; yet, he doesn&#039;t even really pay proper homage to his god. He commits plenty of unfairness when it serves him.

When we do this, we should do it with a twinkle in our eye, rather than foam in our mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a valid point. However, there remains some scriptural validity in holding out fairness as important, because scripture does this again and again.</p>
<p>The trick is that Christ knew fairness to be important to his Father, but he submitted to unfairness willingly so that something more glorious could be revealed.</p>
<p>The difference between unbelievers and believers is that unbelievers hold fairness to be an end in itself; i.e. if everybody were just &#8220;fair&#8221;, the world would be at peace.</p>
<p>Believers know that fairness is merely a means to the true target, which is godliness. So, we strive for fairness so we can be like God, not because we think it is the be-all and end-all.</p>
<p>So when we encounter the PC version of fairness doctrine, we should continue to point it out&#8211;not because we&#8217;re upset about being mistreated, but because we want to unveil the idolatry of the unbeliever. He claims to hold fairness as his god; yet, he doesn&#8217;t even really pay proper homage to his god. He commits plenty of unfairness when it serves him.</p>
<p>When we do this, we should do it with a twinkle in our eye, rather than foam in our mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
