MEMBER LOGIN




Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

Hosting the Holy One (11)
Carol Ortiz: Hey again! You know along your thought about American Evangelicals having the...

Hosting the Holy One (11)
Christopher Benson: Pastor McCain: Finally, I have a sympathetic reader. I laughed out loud...

On Hymn and Stories (1)
Coyle: Well, you’ve kind of taken the two best stories by citing Newton and Spafford....

Hosting the Holy One (11)
Rev. Paul T. McCain: I don’t understand how/why building church buildings that look...

God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades (6)
Coyle: Re: #2. Rev. McCain, you and I for once are on exactly...

On My Honor (1)
Rev. Paul T. McCain: Scouting is HUGE in the St. Louis area, one of the nation’s most active...

Archives

Categories

Monthly


« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Thursday, October 29, 2009, 6:23 AM

A number of posts recently have been touching on the subject of e-Church or having a virtual parish community.

Virtual worship services lack the following features:

  • Sacrifice —  A the fundamental aspect of liturgy is sacrifice. The service is our offering to God and part of that sacrifice to God is of our time and our presence. Reducing that sacrifice to sitting before your computer screen in your proverbial pajamas certainly severely diminishes if not eliminates the sacrifice involved. There is also an aspect of “standing to be counted” especially in an increasingly secular world to worship … which when done anonymously and virtually causes that aspect to be eliminates as well. Moses travelled up the mountain to write the tablets. He did not have God “wire” him his message because he could not be bothered to go to God himself.
  • Holiness — “Then he said, “Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground.” Liturgy is (or should be) a participation in the Holy. For myself, I fail to see how participation and contact with the Holy can be done by wire.
  • Contact with the liturgy and with the community. We have 5 senses. A virtual service may serve, poorly, two (hearing and sight). Touch, taste and smell are sensory channels missing in form the virtual sensory pallet. Humans remain more primitive and essential in our connection with these other senses. Hugging, kissing, touching, even smelling the presence of our neighbour remain an essential part of the human community experience. If the human essence could be reduced to a purely rational floating intellect then virtual community and church might work. Yet man, created in the image of God is not purely rational and the organism and the meat of us is part of that image.
  • Isolation in modernity is exacerbated by virtual contact. It is a bug not a feature of the modern world. Moving church to the virtual realm does nothing to reverse this.

How does the concept of virtual church confront these aspects of worship? Why or how do these aspects become inessential?



Related posts:

  1. A Virtual Argument for the Virtual Church
  2. People of the Fad: Evangelicalism’s Attraction to Online Church
  3. The Subtle Narcissism of Church Segmentation
  4. How the Church Created the Welfare State
  5. The Evangelical Church is the Medieval Catholic Church Purged of Heresies and Abuses

1 Comment

    Collin Brendemuehl
    October 29th, 2009 | 6:34 am | #1

    I find the whole “virtual” thing just wrong. If the church were all about the dissemination of information then it might work. But when it comes to fulfilling the relational character of the church, the distance of the virtual takes away or reduces interpersonal responsibility and opportunitiees.