SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • teleologist: Thanks you for the opportunity to express our opinions with the time that we had. Tongues will cease,...
  • Orthodoxdj: As Tolkien said to Lewis as they parted on that fateful night in Oxford, “Goodbye.”
  • Livingston Dell: I didn’t always comment as frequently as I had liked to on these articles, but I always...
  • Nikolai Volk: You know, we had a hell of a run in these comment sections. I’ve had many a great discussion with...
  • David Strunk: Hey Joe, I also appreciated what you guys did here, and always had this blog on my RSS feed to see the...
  • Amy K. Hall: Thanks for starting the blog, Joe. It was an honor to be included.
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Friday, October 23, 2009, 3:34 AM

    Most of us have heard the old quip, made famous in Annie Hall, about a meal in which the food is terrible—and the portions are too small. Recently I heard the inverse complaint made many times about this fledgling blog: The content is great—and there’s too much of it!

    Initially, I was sympathetic since I was beginning to have the same concern. But then it dawned on me that this is a bizarre objection that reflects our fast-food mentality toward information. Not only do we think that all worthwhile content has to be delivered to us right now but we feel as if it has to be consumed in one sitting. Otherwise, why bother with it at all?

    But many—if not most—of the posts on this blog are meant to be timely while not being constrained by the calendar. All of the discussions so far will be as relevant next week, next month, or next year, as they are today (or would have been yesterday).

    Indeed one of the goals of this blog is to fight the pernicious effects of the type of information consumption that discourages the placement of issues and events into a larger or deeper context. As historian C. John Sommerville once noted, the very survival of the news business depends on our seeing life as jumpy and scattered rather than as falling into a historical pattern or embodying some philosophical outlook. The constant need to find new events to talk about tends to displace any serious attempt to discuss the historical and philosophical implications of such events.

    Its certainly true that we want to create a blog that is entertaining, relevant, and interesting on a daily basis. But as evangelicals we also want to take an eternal perspective, recognizing that we are part of a narrative that doesn’t always fit into the contraints of Internet time. We don’t want to be long-winded and dull, of course. But most discussions of lasting significance can’t be distilled into a soundbite-sized blog post.

    So if you’re having trouble keeping up with the content, try this: Read this blog on your own schedule. Don’t worry about finishing every post every day. Save some of the threads for when you have more time to read—and digest—them. If we can use our DVRs to “timeshift” our favorite TV shows and catch up on entire series on DVD, why can’t we do the same for blogs? Why do we have a need to “finish” a blog’s daily content in the same day it was produced?

    Many blogs can be successful by tapping into the microzeitgeist, focusing on what is going on . . . right . . . now. Evangel is not one of those blogs. If you don’t think our content will be worth reading two or three days from now, then we have failed—for that means it probably isn’t worth reading at all.

    4 Comments

      Frank Turk
      October 23rd, 2009 | 7:11 am | #1

      Wha … ? You mean we’re writing for the ages?

      Oh brother … I’m going back and deleting some stuff …

      Mark Lamprecht
      October 23rd, 2009 | 11:42 am | #2

      Hey Joe…that makes me want to sing a Jimi Hendrix song….anyway…

      This blog is off to a pretty good start. However, if this pace keeps up I’m not sure who will be able to keep up with it.

      I’m already having trouble finding posts I’ve commented on.

      We’ll see what happens.

      Jeremy Pierce
      October 23rd, 2009 | 6:04 pm | #3

      I wonder if you could recycle a post about RSS readers from your E.O. series about blogging to facilitate those who want to time-delay individual posts but aren’t aware of how much easier that is if they read blogs via RSS.

      Brandon
      October 29th, 2009 | 5:36 pm | #4

      Excellent post! I am glad you said it. I would also like to point out that “information” can be had in great abundance. However, information is unfiltered. Knowledge and wisdom make use of information but information does not provide knowledge or wisdom. A wise person uses a good filter on the information he consumes.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact