During the Bush administration, I kept running into younger evangelicals who would bemoan the partisanship of our times. Evidently President Bush and Republicans like myself were hell-bent on demonizing those with whom we disagreed. I knew such things happened, even a great books teacher must notice the outside world occasionally, but the “attacks” never seemed to amount to much.
A nation that endured “James G. Blaine, the Continental Liar from the State of Maine” and “Ma, Ma, Where’s My Paw? Gone to the White House! Ha! Ha! Ha!” seemed able to stand a few barbs from talk radio hosts.
“No! No!” these earnest and fresh faced types assured me. These were particularly partisan times. This sometimes seemed true and when lines were crossed (Bushitler t-shirts come to mind . . . or more recent weirdling claims that President Obama is the antichrist), I was with the Utopians, but mostly they seemed more upset than the history of the nation would justify. We were not after all in Plato’s Magnesia and I shuddered at the idea a Christian Nocturnal Council to Enforce Fair Political Discourse.
Often the opponents of political nastiness struck me as pretty nasty in their hatred of nastiness.
We are not ruled by gods, but by men and so a little bubble piercing ridicule from all sides seemed healthy to me. One has to pick sides in our two-party system and a little levity at the other team did not seem out of order. But these folks would squint at me and reply in a particularly humorless way . . .
“Didn’t I know God was not a Republican . . . or a Democrat? “Given my strong suspicions He was a monarchist, I certainly did know God was not partisan, but I saw no reason I should not be. God has quite a few properties I don’t have (omniscience being the most relevant) and I have quite a few properties He does not have. God is, for example, not a voting citizen of this republic and I am.
“But no,” the earnest student would reply, ‘there is a hope that all this sad partisanship coming from the religious right . . . so hateful and narrow could come to an end.” It would end with the election of President Obama.
Of late, however, this non-partisan President, my President, has said that I (as a traditional Republican) just obey orders and don’t think for myself. He has chosen not to negotiate even with very moderate Republican on health care. In short, often he has acted more as a head of party than head of state.
Now this does not bother me, because this is what I expect from my elected leaders under a constitution where the head of state is also the head of government, but I wonder if it bothers these earnest students. I don’t put much hope in princes, that is why I am a coservative, but they did. I expect the requisite hypocrisy and bellicose rhetoric, but they did not.
President Obama is my president. As leader of the Free World, he is my guy! On the other hand, he represents a political party and philosophy I think, on the whole, wrong headed, so as head of government I am happy to give him an occasional rasberry from the back aisles. He gives my team at least as good as he gets and that is the way things must be this side of Paradise, but I wonder if my earnest good-hearted Democratic friends are disappinted that President Obama is just a pol after all.

October 23rd, 2009 | 9:41 pm | #1
(dislike)
October 23rd, 2009 | 9:55 pm | #2
Sob.
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:00 pm | #3
LOL
No, no. Your post is a good one, a swell “one good turn deserves another,” etc etc. (But you don’t need stupid me to tell you that.)
Just hoped we’d get more than a week into it before political blogging showed up. :-)
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:05 pm | #4
Let me respond with more substance to Wilson’s comment after my unfortunate display of emotion in the last comment. It seems to me that the right parenthesis of his post, “(“, was unduly harsh.
It reminded me of the frown-y emoticon that during my formative Internet years was often used to marginalize my views. I don’t have time to deal with the substance of the rest of his response at this time, but be assured that the sheer partisanship of the response has been noted. My friends in the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy are on alert.
Can’t we all get along? Can’t we follow Mr. Turk’s fine example and share the sweet bread of ecumenism and a tolerance of everything . . . even things we think wrong headed?
I say again, “This partisanship of personal opinions should end.”
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:09 pm | #5
LOL?
LOL?
What is this “LOL?” Is this some new emergent church code for “laughable old lunatic?”
Is this some new acronym the cool kids are using?
Well: rotflmho to you!
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #6
lolz
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:11 pm | #7
My mother just told me that joking about with an esteemed colleague like Wilson in a comment box is a sign of a life ill spent.
October 23rd, 2009 | 11:24 pm | #8
I thought that this website was: “an interreligious, nonpartisan research and education institute whose purpose is to advance a religiously informed public philosophy for the ordering of society.”
Please let me know when this website matures to its vision. Thank you.
October 23rd, 2009 | 11:59 pm | #9
Edward,
We will let you know. Seriously.
We are so sorry in these difficult times not to be serious at all times. This is my fault and not Mr. Wilson’s as it is the result of years of watching the Pythons late at night on PBS in the age before DVD. My mother warned me about it, but I would not listen.
You see the result.
Please leave an email address and we will let you know when we achieve the needed seriousness.
John Mark
October 24th, 2009 | 10:52 am | #10
I picture Edward as Sam the Eagle from the Muppet Show.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact