SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Masthead

Recent Comments

  • Randy McDonald: Tom Gilson: “There is instructive value in having laws like anti-sodomy: they say that we as a...
  • Randy McDonald: De Las Casas: “Many supporters of SSM don’t realize that using the word “marriage” for gay...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: Q: “Nikolai Volk, Do you affirm Scripture’s teachings that same-sex behavior is...
  • Truth Unites... and Divides: “Thanks for this conversation… it’s been quite helpful in drawing out the key...
  • Nikolai Volk: Understood, Tom. I definitely agree with you here, and I’m glad that you recognize the importance...
  • Jake Belder: Conflict within churches and between Christians is an unfortunate reality owing to our sinfulness. But...
  • Archives

    Categories

    Monthly


    « Previous  |Home|  Next »         

    Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 10:43 PM

    In a previous post, I proposed that a portion of the schism between evangelicals and non-evangelicals may be found along the fault-line of local church / hierarchy: Does the hierarchy / denomination serve local churches or do local churches serve the hierarchy / denomination? I lamented the weakness of ecclesiology in our current theological climate.

    Has anyone else noted the parallels between what’s happening with our ecclesiological issues and current questions about the role of the federal government: Does the federal government serve the people or do the people serve the federal government?

    Is it possible that ecclesiological considerations might help us to navigate the issues related to the proper role of government? Or is that just more “evangelical idolatry of politics”?

    Comments are closed.

    Links

    Blogs

    Find Us

    Contact